Modified directly observed antiretroviral therapy compared with self-administered therapy in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: a randomized trial

Citation: Gross R, Tierney C, Andrade A, Lalama C, Rosenkranz S, Eshleman SH, Flanigan T, Santana J, Salomon N, Reisler R, Wiggins I, Hogg E, Flexner C, Mildvan D; AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5073 Study Team. Modified directly observed antiretroviral therapy compared with self-administered therapy in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jul 13;169(13):1224-32. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.172.

Access full article:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19597072

BACKGROUND:
Success of antiretroviral therapy depends on high rates of adherence, but few interventions are effective. Our objective was to determine if modified directly observed therapy (mDOT) improves initial antiretroviral success.

METHODS:
In an open-label, randomized trial comparing mDOT (Monday-Friday for 24 weeks) and self-administered therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir soft gel capsules (800 mg/200 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and either extended-release stavudine (100 mg) or tenofovir (300 mg), all taken once daily, 82 participants received mDOT and 161, self-administered therapy. Participant eligibility included a plasma human immunodeficiency virus RNA level higher than 2000 copies/mL and being naïve to antiretroviral therapy. A total of 243 participants were predominantly male (79%) (median age, 38 years), with 84 Latinos (35%), 74 non-Latino blacks (30%), and 79 non-Latino whites (33%). The study was conducted at 23 AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) sites in the United States and 1 site in South Africa between October 2002 and January 2006. The primary outcome was virologic success at week 24 and secondary outcomes were virologic success, clinical progression, and adherence at week 48.

RESULTS:
Over 24 weeks, mDOT had greater virologic success (0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 0.95) than self-administered therapy (0.84; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.89), but the difference (0.07; lower bound 95% CI, -0.01) did not reach the prespecified threshold of 0.075. Over 48 weeks, virologic success was not significantly different between mDOT (0.72; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.81) and self-administered therapy (0.78; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.84) (difference, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.07 [P = .19]).

CONCLUSIONS:
The potential benefit of mDOT was marginal and not sustained after discontinuation. Modified DOT should not be incorporated routinely for care of treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00036452.

Categories

CRS
Topics

Clinical Trials

A5225: Phase I/II Dose-Finding Study of High-Dose...

A5225/HiFLAC is a Phase I/II dose escalation and validation study of the safety, tolerability, and therapeutic effect of an...

Read More

A5314: Effect of LDMTX on Inflammation in HIV-infected...

A5314 is a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 36-week trial that will examine the safety and efficacy of...

Read More

A5290, A Randomized, Phase 2b Study of a Double-Dose...

Rifampin (RIF), the cornerstone of TB treatment, has very problematic drug-drug interactions with PIs. The use of relatively...

Read More

A5329: Interferon –Free Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C...

A5329 is a study for people who are infected with both HIV and the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and have never taken Hepatitis C...

Read More

P1108: A Phase I/II, Open-Label, Single Arm Study to...

This purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of bedaquiline (BDQ) in...

Read More