HIV Salvage Therapy Does Not Require Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors HIV Salvage Therapy Does Not Require Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Topic:

HIV Prevention

Authors:

Tashima KT, Smeaton LM, Fichtenbaum CJ, Andrade A, Eron JJ, Gandhi RT, Johnson VA, Klingman KL, Ritz J, Hodder S, Santana JL, Wilkin T, Haubrich RH; A5241 Study Team. 

External Link:

Link to article

BACKGROUND: Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are often included in antiretroviral regimens in treatment-experienced patients in the absence of data from randomized trials.

OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment success between participants who omit versus those who add NRTIs to an optimized antiretroviral regimen of 3 or more agents.

DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00537394).

SETTING: Outpatient HIV clinics.

PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection and viral resistance.

INTERVENTION: Open-label optimized regimens (not including NRTIs) were selected on the basis of treatment history and susceptibility testing. Participants were randomly assigned to omit or add NRTIs.

MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy outcome was regimen failure through 48 weeks using a noninferiority margin of 15%. The primary safety outcome was time to initial episode of a severe sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality before discontinuation of NRTI assignment.

RESULTS: 360 participants were randomly assigned, and 93% completed a 48-week visit. The cumulative probability of regimen failure was 29.8% in the omit-NRTIs group versus 25.9% in the add-NRTIs group (difference, 3.2 percentage points [95% CI, -6.1 to 12.5 percentage points]). No significant between-group differences were found in the primary safety end points or the proportion of participants with HIV RNA level less than 50 copies/mL. No deaths occurred in the omit-NRTIs group compared with 7 deaths in the add-NRTIs group.

LIMITATION: Unblinded study design, and the study may not be applicable to resource-poor settings.

CONCLUSION: Treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection starting a new optimized regimen can safely omit NRTIs without compromising virologic efficacy. Omitting NRTIs will reduce pill burden, cost, and toxicity in this patient population.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCES: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck, ViiV Healthcare, Roche, and Monogram Biosciences (LabCorp).

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Dec 5;163(12):908-17. doi: 10.7326/M15-0949. Epub 2015 Nov 24. PMID: 26595748

Categories

CRS
Topics

Clinical Trials

NWCS 408: Examining Longitudinal Cytokine Profiles in HIV-TB...

Using existing data from A5274 and data obtained from retrospectively testing available biospecimens, we propose the following...

Read More

NWCS 445: Novel Biomarkers to Shorten TB Treatment

Objectives: Primary: To develop a highly predictive algorithm that identifies TB patients who will be cured by treatment...

Read More

A5354/EARLIER: Effect of Antiretroviral Treatment Initiated...

This study will include people who have very recently been infected with HIV and will start anti-HIV (antiretroviral) drugs...

Read More

HPTN083: A Phase 2b/3 Double Blind Safety and Efficacy Study...

HPTN 083 is a study being done to evaluate the efficacy of the long-acting injectable agent, cabotegravir (CAB LA), for...

Read More

P1077BF: Breastfeeding Version of the PROMISE Study...

1077BF is a randomized strategy trial, which is part of the PROMISE studies (1077BF, 1077FF, P1084s, and 1077HS). The Promoting...

Read More